Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to QQQM's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and QQQM

Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.0 points; QQQM is 3.1 times larger.

MBB vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$35.6bn$108.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
MBB QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM −0.4% +157.2%
Annualized edge QQQM −0.1% +17.0%
Price return edge QQQM −17.2% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge MBB 6.0% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge MBB −17.4% −35.0%
Downside capture 78.4% 99.8%
Beta 0.76 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM −0.53 0.70
Sortino edge QQQM −0.73 1.07
Treynor 0.009 0.147
Calmar edge QQQM 0.00 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.26 0.62
Information ratio −0.03 0.10
Tracking error 2.3% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MBB against SPMB, Feb 6, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to −0.4%. MBB swung less: 6.0% to 21.0%. MBB fell less at its worst: −17.4% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MBB vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−0.4%+157.2%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−0.1%+17.0%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−17.2%+147.9%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.0%21.0%MBBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.3%13.6%MBBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−17.4%−35.0%MBBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture77.8%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture78.4%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.761.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.530.70QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.731.07QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0090.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.000.49QQQMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPMBQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.260.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.8% to +1.1%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.030.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.3%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB QQQM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.15%
Holdings 10813 105
Net assets, MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $35.5bn $110.4bn

MBB and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6E651A6080

MBB and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MBB follows Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MBB returned −0.8% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MBB and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or QQQM?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.