Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to MTUM's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and MTUM

Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.2 points; MBB is 1.9 times larger.

MBB vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBMTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$35.6bn$18.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight93%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB MTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB +4.8 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.15%
Holdings 10813 126
Net assets, MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $35.5bn $18.7bn

MBB and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB and MTUM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or MTUM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and MTUM +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or MTUM?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-mtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.