Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and MBB

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; MBB is 1.4 times larger.

CGGR vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$25.6bn$35.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight78%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38%
NVIDIA Corp 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.63%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Visa Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 3.21%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +2.6% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.04%
Holdings 96 10813
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.9bn $35.5bn

CGGR and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.