Which returned more over the last year, MBB or RDVY?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MBB or RDVY?

MBB charges 0.04% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MBB vs RDVY: how they differ

MBB and RDVY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

iShares MBS ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and RDVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MBB	Only in RDVY
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 7.26%	Lam Research Corporation 3.09%
GNMA2 SF 30YR 0.09%	Applied Materials, Inc. 2.99%
GNMA II 30YR SF - JUMBO-CONFORMING 0.08%	KLA Corporation 2.47%
GNMA2 SINGLE FAMILY 30YR 0.04%	The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.46%
GNMA II 30YR 0.03%	The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.26%
GNMA2 30YR TBA(REG C) 0.03%	GE Vernova Inc. 2.24%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.03%	Bank of America Corporation 2.18%
FNMA 30YR UMBS MEGA REMIC SUPER 0.02%	Ross Stores, Inc. 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MBB and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MBB iShares MBS ETF	RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	First Trust
What it is	Mbs	First Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+22.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+4.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.47%
Holdings	2599	72

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 24.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or RDVY?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MBB or RDVY?: MBB charges 0.04% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MBB against RDVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against RDVY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-rdvy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources