Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and MBB

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.9bn for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and $35.5bn for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; MBB is 9.1 times larger.

AOR vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%−0.8%
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets$3.9bn$35.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +7.8% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Holdings 7 10813
Net assets $3.9bn $35.5bn

AOR and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.