Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGBL vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGBL and MBB

Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
CGBL total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGBL expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; MBB is 4.5 times larger.

CGBL vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.04%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$7.9bn$35.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund59.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returns
CGBL MBB
Return
Total return edge CGBL +55.6% +18.2%
Annualized edge CGBL +15.6% +5.6%
Price return edge CGBL +46.8% +4.5%
Risk
Volatility edge MBB 10.4% 5.9%
Max drawdown edge MBB −10.0% −5.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGBL 1.02 0.20
Sortino edge CGBL 1.58 0.29
Calmar edge CGBL 1.55 1.08
Reading

CGBL returned more: +55.6% to +18.2%. MBB swung less: 5.9% to 10.4%. MBB fell less at its worst: −5.2% to −10.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGBL vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGBLMBBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+55.6%+18.2%CGBLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.6%+5.6%CGBLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+46.8%+4.5%CGBLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility10.4%5.9%MBBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.7%4.0%MBBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−10.0%−5.2%MBBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.020.20CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.580.29CGBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.551.08CGBLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGBL MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGBL
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.27%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.64%
Broadcom Inc 4.58%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 3.49%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%
Apple Inc 2.01%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +7.1% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.5% (VOO and AGG) −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs VOO and AGG +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.04%
Holdings 77 10813
Net assets, CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 and MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 $7.9bn $35.5bn

CGBL and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGBL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.

CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGBL against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.