Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to CGBL's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and CGBL
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $7.9bn for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF.
Pair scorecard
AGG costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; AGG is 17.6 times larger.
| Measure | AGG | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +7.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $139.4bn | $7.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and CGBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and CGBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or CGBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and CGBL +7.1%.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or CGBL?
- AGG is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against CGBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-cgbl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against CGBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-cgbl
[AGG against CGBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-cgbl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.