Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BND vs CGBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to CGBL's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and CGBL
Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; BND is far larger, $161.4bn against $7.7bn.
| Measure | BND | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | +7.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020 | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $161.4bn | $7.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BND and CGBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BND and CGBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or CGBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and CGBL +7.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or CGBL?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against CGBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgbl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BND against CGBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgbl
[BND against CGBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgbl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.