Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BND vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and PDBC
Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 56.9 points.
| Measure | BND | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | +55.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Aug 6, 2020 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 | $161.4bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BND and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BND and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or PDBC?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BND against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-pdbc
[BND against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.