Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or MBB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and MBB returned −0.1%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or MBB?

ACWI charges 0.32% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs MBB: how they differ

ACWI and MBB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares MBS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWI	Only in MBB
NVIDIA 4.89%	BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 7.26%
APPLE 4.67%	GNMA2 SF 30YR 0.09%
MICROSOFT 3.38%	GNMA II 30YR SF - JUMBO-CONFORMING 0.08%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%	GNMA2 SINGLE FAMILY 30YR 0.04%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%	GNMA II 30YR 0.03%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%	GNMA2 30YR TBA(REG C) 0.03%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%	UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.03%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%	FNMA 30YR UMBS MEGA REMIC SUPER 0.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI ACWI	Mbs
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	−0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	−17.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.04%
Holdings	1630	2599

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or MBB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and MBB returned −0.1%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or MBB?: ACWI charges 0.32% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against MBB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against MBB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-mbb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources