Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

LYTE vs USO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

LYTE and USO are measured over different days, and LYTE charges 0.65% to USO's 0.86%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LYTE and USO

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $165m for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF and $1.9bn for United States Oil Fund, LP.

At a glance
−19.6%
LYTE total return, since launch, Aug 6, 2026
+133.3%
USO total return, 1 year
0.65%
LYTE expense ratio
0.86%
USO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LYTE costs 0.21 points a year less; USO is 11.5 times larger.

LYTE vs USO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLYTEUSO
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+133.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Below its high82.3%, high on Jul 14, 2008
Benchmark
What it tracksPhotonics and opticsOil futures
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.86%
Net assets$165m$1.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Side by side

LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF USO United States Oil Fund, LP
Where it sits Thematic ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Photonics and optics Holds oil futures
Total return, 1 year −19.6% (since launch, Aug 6, 2026) +133.3%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.86%
Net assets $165m $1.9bn

LYTE and USO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

LYTE and USO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LYTE

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

USO

USO holds oil futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +133.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.86% a year. It sat 82.3% below its high of Jul 14, 2008 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are LYTE and USO in the same category?
LYTE is a thematic ETF and USO is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, LYTE or USO?
LYTE is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LYTE against USO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lyte-vs-uso

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.