A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

JBBB vs SCYB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year JBBB returned +4.9% to SCYB's +1.0%, and SCYB charges 0.03% to JBBB's 0.47%. Net assets: $1.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF, and $2.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about JBBB and SCYB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

SCYB costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points.

JBBB vs SCYB: Differences, Returns & Fees
JBBBSCYB
Expense ratio0.47%0.03%
Net assets, JBBB as of Jul 31, 2026 and SCYB as of May 31, 2026$1.4bn$2.5bn
Total return, 1 year+4.9%+1.0%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+4.9%
JBBB total return, 1 year
+1.0%
SCYB total return, 1 year
0.47%
JBBB expense ratio
0.03%
SCYB expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-0BF7099737

JBBB and SCYB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. JBBB follows No index, actively managed and SCYB follows not read by ETFIQ.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JBBB returned +4.9% and SCYB +1.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.9 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JBBB and SCYB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding JBBB SCYB
Only in JBBB
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF 3.56%
Tikehau US CLO VII Ltd., Series 2025-1A, Class D1, due Feb 25, 2038 1.79%
Regatta XVIII Funding Ltd., Series 2021-1A, Class D1R, due Apr 15, 2038 1.63%
Palmer Square CLO Ltd., Series 2024-2A, Class D1R, due Jul 20, 2038 1.42%
Tikehau US CLO VI Ltd., Series 2024-1A, Class D1, due Jul 18, 2037 1.41%
Sound Point CLO 2025R-1 Ltd., Series 2025-1RA, Class D1, due Feb 20, 2038 1.18%
AGL CLO 39 Ltd., Series 2025-39A, Class D1, due Apr 20, 2038 1.11%
Regatta X Funding Ltd., Series 2017-3A, Class D1R2, due Jul 17, 2037 1.10%
Only in SCYB
1261229 BC Ltd, due Apr 15, 2032 0.42%
Meridian Arc Holdco LLC, due Apr 30, 2031 0.36%
EchoStar Corp, due Nov 30, 2029 0.29%
Cloud Software Group Inc, due Mar 31, 2029 0.27%
Quikrete Holdings Inc, due Mar 1, 2032 0.24%
SV RNO Property Owner 1 LLC, due Mar 1, 2031 0.23%
Core Scientific Finance I LLC, due May 15, 2031 0.23%
Asurion LLC/ Asurion Co-Issuer Inc, due Dec 31, 2032 0.22%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Janus Henderson Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +4.9% +1.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +2.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.03%
Holdings 239 1833
Net assets, JBBB as of Jul 31, 2026 and SCYB as of May 31, 2026 $1.4bn $2.5bn

JBBB and SCYB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JBBB

JBBB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year.

About SCYB

SCYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JBBB or SCYB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JBBB returned +4.9% and SCYB +1.0%.
Which is cheaper, JBBB or SCYB?
SCYB is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
JBBB vs JPHYANGL vs JBBBBHYB vs JBBBHYLB vs JBBBBHYB vs SCYBSCYB vs USHYHYDB vs SCYBPHYL vs SCYB
JBBB on its own →SCYB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →JBBB dividend history →JBBB holdings →SCYB dividend history →SCYB holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
JBBB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JBBB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Janus Henderson website ↗SCYB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SCYB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Schwab website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JBBB against SCYB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jbbb-vs-scyb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.