FALN vs SCYB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FALN's duration was 4.6 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SCYB's 3.0 on May 31, 2026; SCYB charges 0.03% to FALN's 0.25%. Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF, and $2.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF.
SCYB costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; FALN is 2.3 times larger.
| FALN | SCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025 | $2.1bn | $909m |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.8% | +1.0% |
| What it tracks | Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FALN and SCYB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FALN follows Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index and SCYB follows not read by ETFIQ.
- Holdings in common. 6% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. FALN holds 156 positions and SCYB holds 1833.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FALN and SCYB hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
6% in common
On the same fields
FALN and SCYB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FALN
FALN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About SCYB
SCYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FALN or SCYB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FALN returned −0.8% and SCYB +1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FALN or SCYB?
- SCYB is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FALN against SCYB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/faln-vs-scyb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FALN against SCYB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/faln-vs-scyb
[FALN against SCYB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/faln-vs-scyb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.