IXUS vs QEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 21, 2026, IXUS and QEFA finished level, +16.3% against +16.1%, and they share 42% of their weight. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $57.8bn for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and $1.0bn for State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF.
IXUS costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IXUS is far larger, $57.8bn against $1.0bn.
| IXUS | QEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 20, 2026 | $57.8bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +16.1% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI | MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| Holdings in common | 42% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 13.3% | 15.1% |
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 20, 2026.
IXUS and QEFA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IXUS follows MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI and QEFA follows MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index.
- Holdings in common. 42% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 20, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IXUS holds 4,596 positions and QEFA holds 626.
Data as of Oct 21, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and QEFA hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 20, 2026.
half
42% in common
On the same fields
IXUS and QEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IXUS
IXUS tracks the MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Oct 21, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,596 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 21, 2026.
About QEFA
QEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 21, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 626 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or QEFA?
- In the year to Oct 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +16.3% and QEFA +16.1%.
- Which is cheaper, IXUS or QEFA?
- IXUS is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IXUS against QEFA, data as of Oct 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-qefa
ETFIQ. (Oct 21, 2026). IXUS against QEFA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-qefa
[IXUS against QEFA (ETFIQ, Oct 21, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-qefa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.