IWY vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWY and ONEQ hold 60% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned +16.3% over the year. Net assets: $15.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
IWY costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; IWY is 1.5 times larger.
| IWY | ONEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $16.4bn | $10.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +16.3% |
| What it tracks | Russell Top 200 Growth Index | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Holdings in common | 60% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.9% | 57.6% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWY and ONEQ hold 60% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
60% in common
On the same fields
IWY and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWY
IWY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,021 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWY or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWY returned +4.7% and ONEQ +16.3%.
- Which is cheaper, IWY or ONEQ?
- IWY is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWY against ONEQ, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWY against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-oneq
[IWY against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.