Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWX vs VOOV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWX returned +29.2% to VOOV's +15.5%; 64% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWX and VOOV
Net assets: $3.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF, and $6.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
VOOV costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.7 points; VOOV is 1.8 times larger.
| Measure | IWX | VOOV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +29.2% | +15.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Top 200 Value Index | S&P 500 Value Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.7bn | $6.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.7% | 24.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 840 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IWX against IWV, Oct 9, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; VOOV against IVE, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
IWX and VOOV returned about the same: +539.0% and +535.2%. IWX swung slightly less: 15.2% to 15.8%. IWX fell slightly less at its worst: −32.7% to −34.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWX | VOOV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +539.0% | +535.2% | Tie | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.2% | +12.1% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +341.9% | +348.4% | Tie | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.2% | 15.8% | IWX (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.7% | 11.0% | IWX (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.7% | −34.4% | IWX (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 79.1% | 99.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 89.6% | 99.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.87 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.87 | 0.99 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.73 | 0.70 | IWX (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.03 | 1.01 | IWX (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.124 | 0.112 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.37 | 0.35 | IWX (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWV | IVE | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.3% a year | +0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.19 | 0.32 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.9% to +2.3% | −0.5% to +0.7% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.32 | 0.04 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.8% | 1.2% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 840 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWX and VOOV hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
64% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWX and VOOV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWX and VOOV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IWX follows Russell Top 200 Value Index and VOOV follows S&P 500 Value Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWX returned +29.2% and VOOV +15.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.7 points.
- Cost. IWX charges 0.20% of assets a year and VOOV 0.07%, a gap of 0.13 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWX tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.
VOOV
VOOV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 438 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWX or VOOV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWX returned +29.2% and VOOV +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWX or VOOV?
- VOOV is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWX against VOOV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-voov
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWX against VOOV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-voov
[IWX against VOOV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-voov)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.