Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to VTWO's +14.3%; 54% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and VTWO

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; VTWO is 1.2 times larger.

IWO vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common54%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
IWO VTWO
Return
Total return edge IWO (slight) +419.6% +409.2%
Annualized edge Tie +10.8% +10.6%
Price return edge IWO +359.8% +315.9%
Risk
Volatility edge VTWO (slight) 22.2% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge Tie −40.5% −40.2%
Downside capture 100.1% 99.5%
Beta 1.00 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.50 0.51
Sortino edge Tie 0.73 0.74
Treynor 0.111 0.108
Calmar edge Tie 0.27 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.06 0.46
Information ratio 0.01 0.02
Tracking error 1.5% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWO returned slightly more: +419.6% to +409.2%. VTWO swung slightly less: 21.0% to 22.2%. IWO and VTWO fell about the same at their worst: −40.5% and −40.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+419.6%+409.2%IWO (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.8%+10.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+359.8%+315.9%IWOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.2%21.0%VTWO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.3%14.5%VTWO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.5%−40.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.500.51TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.730.74TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1110.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.26TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWGIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.060.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +0.7%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.010.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.5%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

54%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VTWO hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO VTWO
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71% 0.42%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68% 0.36%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61% 0.35%
JFROG 0.74% 0.35%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66% 0.31%
GLAUKOS 0.70% 0.31%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.56% 0.29%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.58% 0.28%
FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.51% 0.28%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58% 0.28%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57% 0.28%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60% 0.27%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
AKERO THERAPEUTICS CVR 0.00%
ARCELLX INC CVR 0.00%
CHINOOK THERAPEUTICS INC 0.00%
CHINOOK THERAPEUTICS INC CVR 0.00%
COHERUS ONCOLOGY INC 0.00%
GTXI INC - CVR 0.00%
INHIBRX INC CVR 0.00%
OMNIAB INC $12.50 VESTING Prvt 0.00%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Viasat Inc 0.30%
CareTrust REIT Inc 0.29%
Jackson Financial Inc 0.28%
PBF Energy Inc 0.25%
Arcosa Inc 0.24%
Terreno Realty Corp 0.23%
Matson Inc 0.22%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 1122 2002
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $16.6bn

IWO and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B277E92BF3

IWO and VTWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWO returned +7.9% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.4 points.
  3. Cost. IWO charges 0.24% of assets a year and VTWO 0.06%, a gap of 0.18 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.