Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJR vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJR returned +17.5% to IWO's +7.9%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJR and IWO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $104.6bn for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+17.5%
IJR total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.06%
IJR expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJR costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; IJR is 7.5 times larger.

IJR vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Aug 14, 20269.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600Russell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.06%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$104.6bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,368 weekly returns
IJR IWO
Return
Total return edge IJR +1,013.0% +433.5%
Annualized edge IJR +9.6% +6.6%
Price return edge IJR +702.8% +350.2%
Risk
Volatility edge IJR (slight) 21.9% 23.8%
Max drawdown edge Tie −57.3% −58.2%
Downside capture 98.9% 100.1%
Beta 0.99 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IJR 0.45 0.31
Sortino edge IJR 0.65 0.44
Treynor 0.097 0.111
Calmar edge IJR 0.17 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.6% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 0.06
Information ratio 0.20 0.01
Tracking error 2.4% 1.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IJR against SPSM, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IJR returned more: +1,013.0% to +433.5%. IJR swung slightly less: 21.9% to 23.8%. IJR and IWO fell about the same at their worst: −57.3% and −58.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IJR vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJRIWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,013.0%+433.5%IJRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.6%+6.6%IJRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+702.8%+350.2%IJRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.9%23.8%IJR (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.2%16.9%IJR (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.3%−58.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.7%100.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.9%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.991.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.450.31IJRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.650.44IJRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0970.111Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.170.11IJRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPSMVTWGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.6% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.910.06Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +1.9%−0.7% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%1.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,368 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and IWO hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJR IWO
GLAUKOS 0.61% 0.70%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.52% 0.58%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.51% 0.60%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.46% 0.55%
VICTORIA S SECRET 0.42% 0.45%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.41% 0.50%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP 0.40% 0.48%
ALKERMES 0.42% 0.40%
MAXLINEAR 0.36% 0.44%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A 0.36% 0.42%
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS 0.35% 0.42%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES 0.35% 0.42%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJR
PAYCOM SOFTWARE 0.57%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
VIASAT INC 0.55%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.48%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.46%
RALLIANT 0.44%
CARMAX INC 0.43%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL 0.43%
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%
HEALTHEQUITY 0.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +17.5% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.6% (SPSM) +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPSM −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 642 1122
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $104.6bn $14.0bn

IJR and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F40EED10D6

IJR and IWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IJR follows S&P SmallCap 600 and IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJR returned +17.5% and IWO +7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJR and IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJR

IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 642 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +17.5% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, IJR or IWO?
IJR is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJR against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijr-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.