Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJT returned +15.4% to IWO's +7.9%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJT and IWO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.5bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+15.4%
IJT total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJT expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.5 points; IWO is 1.9 times larger.

IJT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJTIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.4%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high8.2%, high on Aug 4, 20269.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 Growth IndexRussell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.5bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund9.6%6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,368 weekly returns
IJT IWO
Return
Total return edge IJT +883.6% +433.5%
Annualized edge IJT +9.1% +6.6%
Price return edge IJT +704.6% +350.2%
Risk
Volatility edge IJT (slight) 21.7% 23.8%
Max drawdown edge IJT (slight) −56.7% −58.2%
Downside capture 95.0% 100.1%
Beta 0.91 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IJT 0.43 0.31
Sortino edge IJT 0.61 0.44
Treynor 0.105 0.111
Calmar edge IJT 0.16 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.0% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.64 0.06
Information ratio 0.19 0.01
Tracking error 6.6% 1.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IJT against SLYG, Oct 13, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IJT returned more: +883.6% to +433.5%. IJT swung slightly less: 21.7% to 23.8%. IJT fell slightly less at its worst: −56.7% to −58.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IJT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJTIWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+883.6%+433.5%IJTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+6.6%IJTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+704.6%+350.2%IJTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.7%23.8%IJT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.2%16.9%IJTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−56.7%−58.2%IJT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture90.0%100.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.0%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.911.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.921.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.31IJTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.610.44IJTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1050.111Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.160.11IJTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSLYGVTWGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.0% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.640.06Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +4.4%−0.7% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.190.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.6%1.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,368 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

40%

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and IWO hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

40% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJT IWO
GLAUKOS 0.90% 0.70%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 1.10% 0.60%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.11% 0.58%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.97% 0.55%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.88% 0.50%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP 0.86% 0.48%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES 0.75% 0.42%
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS 0.76% 0.42%
FRONTDOOR INC 0.71% 0.41%
STONEX GROUP INC 0.74% 0.41%
ALKERMES 0.90% 0.40%
CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS CLASS A 0.71% 0.40%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJT
VIASAT INC 1.18%
ETSY 0.91%
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES 0.80%
LYFT CLASS A 0.77%
JBT MAREL 0.68%
MSG KNICKERBOCKERS CLASS A 0.64%
EVERUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP 0.63%
TERRENO REALTY REIT 0.60%
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%
HEALTHEQUITY 0.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +15.4% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.6% (SLYG) +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs SLYG −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 369 1122
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.5bn $14.0bn

IJT and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-02A74D1299

IJT and IWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IJT follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index and IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IJT returned +15.4% and IWO +7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IJT and IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJT

IJT tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 369 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +15.4% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, IJT or IWO?
IJT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJT and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJT against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijt-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.