Which returned more over the last year, IWO or ONEQ?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and ONEQ +12.7%.

Which is cheaper, IWO or ONEQ?

ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWO and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 85% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

IWO vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and ONEQ

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

IWO on its own →ONEQ on its own →

At a glance

+7.9%

IWO total return, 1 year

+12.7%

ONEQ total return, 1 year

0.24%

IWO expense ratio

0.21%

ONEQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ONEQ costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points; IWO is 1.3 times larger.

IWO vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
Return
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
Total return, 1 year	+7.9%	+12.7%
Drawdown
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
Below its high	9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026	3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
What it tracks	Russell 2000 Growth Index	Nasdaq Composite Index
Cost and size
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
Expense ratio	0.24%	0.21%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026	$14.1bn	$10.9bn
Holdings
Measure	IWO	ONEQ
Holdings in common	3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	6.4%	56.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and ONEQ hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO ONEQ

JFROG 0.74% 0.03%

TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71% 0.03%

BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66% 0.02%

KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.56% 0.02%

UMB FINANCIAL 0.05% 0.02%

10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61% 0.02%

KYMERA THERAPEUTICS 0.41% 0.02%

PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES 0.45% 0.02%

PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.58% 0.02%

IMMUNOVANT 0.17% 0.02%

SPYRE THERAPEUTICS INC 0.51% 0.02%

VAXCYTE 0.38% 0.02%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IWO

GLAUKOS 0.70%

MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%

RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%

OSCAR HEALTH CLASS A 0.51%

ZETA GLOBAL HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.51%

ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH CLASS A 0.50%

ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.50%

Only in ONEQ

NVIDIA CORP 11.57%

APPLE INC 10.08%

MICROSOFT CORP 8.16%

AMAZON.COM INC 6.05%

ALPHABET INC 4.28%

ALPHABET INC 3.96%

BROADCOM INC 3.80%

TESLA INC 2.99%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Fidelity

What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks the Nasdaq Composite

Total return, 1 year +7.9% +12.7%

Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) not measured

Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG not measured

Expense ratio 0.24% 0.21%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 84.6%

Holdings 1122 1026

Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $10.9bn

IWO and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

ONEQ

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or ONEQ?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and ONEQ +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or ONEQ?: ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 85% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

FBCG vs IWO IWO vs MAGS IWO vs MGK IWO vs XOVR ONEQ vs VBK ONEQ vs TGRT ONEQ vs PWRD ONEQ vs SQS

Where to next

IWO on its own →ONEQ on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IWO dividend history →IWO holdings →ONEQ dividend history →ONEQ holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IWO ↗

ONEQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ONEQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Fidelity website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-oneq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.