Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and MAGS

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWO costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; IWO is 2.5 times larger.

IWO vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
IWO MAGS
Return
Total return edge MAGS +55.1% +189.1%
Annualized edge MAGS +13.3% +35.2%
Price return edge MAGS +51.7% +181.4%
Risk
Volatility edge IWO 20.3% 24.0%
Max drawdown edge IWO (slight) −26.0% −26.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 0.49 1.19
Sortino edge MAGS 0.74 1.97
Calmar edge MAGS 0.51 1.33
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +55.1%. IWO swung less: 20.3% to 24.0%. IWO fell slightly less at its worst: −26.0% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOMAGSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+55.1%+189.1%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+35.2%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+51.7%+181.4%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.3%24.0%IWOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%14.5%IWO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.0%−26.6%IWO (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.491.19MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.741.97MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.511.33MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG not measured
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 1122 8
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $14.0bn $5.5bn

IWO and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

IWO and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or MAGS?
IWO is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.