Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWO vs MGK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to MGK's +7.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWO and MGK
Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $34.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
MGK costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; MGK is 2.5 times larger.
| Measure | IWO | MGK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.9% | +7.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Growth Index | Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.05% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $14.1bn | $34.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 6.4% | 64.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 981 weekly returnsMGK returned more: +1,024.1% to +402.8%. MGK swung less: 19.5% to 24.1%. MGK fell less at its worst: −46.4% to −51.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWO | MGK | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +402.8% | +1,024.1% | MGK | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.9% | +13.7% | MGK | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +336.2% | +823.8% | MGK | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.1% | 19.5% | MGK | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 16.9% | 13.3% | MGK | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −51.9% | −46.4% | MGK | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.42 | 0.68 | MGK | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.59 | 1.00 | MGK | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.17 | 0.30 | MGK | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 981 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWO and MGK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWO and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWO and MGK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index and MGK follows Morningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IWO holds 1,122 positions and MGK holds 54.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWO
IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
MGK
MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWO or MGK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and MGK +7.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWO or MGK?
- MGK is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWO against MGK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-mgk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWO against MGK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-mgk
[IWO against MGK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-mgk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.