Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to QQQ's +15.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and QQQ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and $483.0bn for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQ total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.18%
QQQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQ costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; QQQ is far larger, $483.0bn against $14.0bn.

IWO vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOQQQ
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$483.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,368 weekly returns
IWO QQQ
Return
Total return edge QQQ +433.5% +827.3%
Annualized edge QQQ +6.6% +8.8%
Price return edge QQQ +350.2% +681.5%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQ (slight) 23.8% 22.9%
Max drawdown edge IWO −58.2% −80.2%
Downside capture 100.1% 100.2%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQ 0.31 0.41
Sortino edge QQQ 0.44 0.58
Treynor 0.111 0.145
Calmar edge IWO (slight) 0.11 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.06 −0.58
Information ratio 0.01 −0.10
Tracking error 1.5% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQ against QQQM, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQ returned more: +827.3% to +433.5%. QQQ swung slightly less: 22.9% to 23.8%. IWO fell less at its worst: −58.2% to −80.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs QQQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+433.5%+827.3%QQQPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+6.6%+8.8%QQQTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+350.2%+681.5%QQQPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.8%22.9%QQQ (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.9%16.1%QQQ (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−58.2%−80.2%IWODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.41QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.440.58QQQReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1110.145Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.110.11IWO (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWGQQQMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.06−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +0.7%−0.4% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.01−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.5%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,368 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO QQQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in QQQ
NVIDIA Corp 8.17%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.14%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Amazon.com Inc 4.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Alphabet Inc 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +15.2% (QQQM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG 0.0 pts vs QQQM
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 95.7%
Holdings 1122 103
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.0bn $483.0bn

IWO and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A1D51E4C13

IWO and QQQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index and QQQ follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWO returned +7.9% and QQQ +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWO and QQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or QQQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and QQQ +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or QQQ?
QQQ is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 96% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against QQQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-qqq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.