Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs XLB: how they differ
IWF and XLB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLB returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWF | Only in XLB |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 15.46% | LINDE PLC 12.91% |
| APPLE 7.77% | NEWMONT CORP 8.14% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% | FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 6.19% |
| MICROSOFT 5.55% | CORTEVA INC 5.11% |
| BROADCOM INC 5.10% | AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.78% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% | ECOLAB INC 4.75% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% | SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO/THE 4.70% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | NUCOR CORP 4.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | XLB State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | Materials |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 315 | 27 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLB in plain words
XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or XLB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and XLB returned +12.0%, so XLB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or XLB?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against XLB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xlb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources