Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWF vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to VPU's −3.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWF and VPU

Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $7.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Utilities ETF.

At a glance
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
−3.3%
VPU total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWF expense ratio
0.09%
VPU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPU costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; IWF is 16.6 times larger.

IWF vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFVPU
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.9%−3.3%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 20268.9%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$127.7bn$7.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%52.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IWF VPU
Return
Total return edge IWF +1,167.4% +683.7%
Annualized edge IWF +11.8% +9.5%
Price return edge IWF +890.8% +273.2%
Risk
Volatility edge VPU (slight) 18.3% 17.6%
Max drawdown edge VPU −50.4% −44.9%
Downside capture 100.1% 100.1%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IWF 0.60 0.50
Sortino edge IWF 0.87 0.70
Treynor 0.149 0.087
Calmar edge IWF 0.23 0.21
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.58 −0.21
Information ratio −0.11 0.00
Tracking error 1.0% 0.6%

Each against its own benchmark: IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VPU against FUTY, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWF returned more: +1,167.4% to +683.7%. VPU swung slightly less: 17.6% to 18.3%. VPU fell less at its worst: −44.9% to −50.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWF vs VPU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFVPUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,167.4%+683.7%IWFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.8%+9.5%IWFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+890.8%+273.2%IWFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.3%17.6%VPU (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%12.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.4%−44.9%VPUDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.8%100.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.50IWFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.70IWFReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1490.087Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.21IWFAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVONGFUTYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.58−0.21Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.3%−0.4% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.110.00Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%0.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VPU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWF VPU
VISTRA 0.15% 3.37%
NRG ENERGY INC 0.06% 1.38%
TALEN ENERGY 0.03% 0.92%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP 0.02% 5.72%
FERVO ENERGY CLASS A 0.00% 0.08%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWF
NVIDIA 15.30%
APPLE 8.18%
MICROSOFT 5.94%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
BROADCOM INC 4.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
Only in VPU
NextEra Energy Inc 11.39%
Southern Co 6.74%
Duke Energy Corp 6.41%
American Electric Power Co Inc 4.66%
Dominion Energy Inc 3.84%
Sempra 3.68%
Entergy Corp 3.34%
Xcel Energy Inc 3.17%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 growth Tracks an index of Utilities
Total return, 1 year +0.9% −3.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +1.1% (VONG) −3.3% (FUTY)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONG 0.0 pts vs FUTY
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 93.5% 89.7%
Holdings 374 70
Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPU as of Sep 30, 2026 $124.7bn $7.7bn

IWF and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0308095AC0

IWF and VPU do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and VPU follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and VPU −3.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPU

VPU tracks an index of Utilities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.3% with distributions reinvested, against −3.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Utilities 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 70 positions, with the top ten at 52.3%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VPU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and VPU −3.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWF or VPU?
VPU is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWF and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWF against VPU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vpu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.