Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWF vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to SCHX's +13.1%; 54% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWF and SCHX

Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWF expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points.

IWF vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.9%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$124.7bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common54%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 884 weekly returns
IWF SCHX
Return
Total return edge IWF +1,080.5% +831.5%
Annualized edge IWF +15.6% +14.0%
Price return edge IWF +884.2% +597.2%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHX (slight) 17.9% 16.2%
Max drawdown edge Tie −32.5% −32.3%
Downside capture 100.1% 100.5%
Beta 1.00 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IWF (slight) 0.82 0.80
Sortino edge IWF (slight) 1.21 1.16
Treynor 0.149 0.129
Calmar edge IWF (slight) 0.48 0.43
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.58 −0.62
Information ratio −0.11 −0.05
Tracking error 1.0% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWF returned more: +1,080.5% to +831.5%. SCHX swung slightly less: 16.2% to 17.9%. IWF and SCHX fell about the same at their worst: −32.5% and −32.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWF vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFSCHXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,080.5%+831.5%IWFPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.6%+14.0%IWFTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+884.2%+597.2%IWFPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.9%16.2%SCHX (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.1%11.2%SCHX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.5%−32.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.8%100.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.820.80IWF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.211.16IWF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1490.129Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.43IWF (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVONGIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.58−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.3%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.11−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 884 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

54%

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and SCHX hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWF SCHX
NVIDIA 15.30% 7.69%
APPLE 8.18% 6.69%
MICROSOFT 5.94% 5.42%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62% 2.86%
BROADCOM INC 4.79% 2.52%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53% 2.28%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36% 1.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.15% 1.56%
TESLA INC 3.58% 1.49%
ELI LILLY 3.08% 1.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.74% 1.10%
VISA CLASS A 2.05% 0.91%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWF
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.94%
GE AEROSPACE 0.93%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.85%
SANDISK 0.57%
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.26%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 0.25%
TJX 0.21%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC 0.20%
Only in SCHX
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.37%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.33%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 0.96%
Johnson & Johnson 0.92%
Intel Corp 0.64%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.63%
Chevron Corp 0.56%
Merck & Co Inc 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 growth Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +0.9% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +1.1% (VONG) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONG −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 93.5% 93.6%
Holdings 374 747
Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $124.7bn $74.2bn

IWF and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-24E8EEEDDA

IWF and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.2 points.
  3. Cost. IWF charges 0.18% of assets a year and SCHX 0.03%, a gap of 0.15 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWF or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWF and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWF against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.