Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to USMV's +10.8%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and USMV
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $24.1bn for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
USMV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; IWF is 5.2 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +10.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $124.7bn | $24.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 14.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 28, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 782 weekly returnsIWF returned more: +835.6% to +423.5%. USMV swung less: 13.4% to 17.8%. USMV fell slightly less at its worst: −30.6% to −32.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWF | USMV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +835.6% | +423.5% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.0% | +11.6% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +702.1% | +295.7% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.8% | 13.4% | USMV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.9% | 9.3% | USMV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.5% | −30.6% | USMV (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.83 | 0.76 | IWF (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.24 | 1.09 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.49 | 0.38 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 782 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and USMV hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
24% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and USMV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and USMV follows MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index.
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and USMV +10.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USMV
USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or USMV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and USMV +10.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or USMV?
- USMV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against USMV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-usmv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against USMV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-usmv
[IWF against USMV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-usmv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.