Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs SPHQ: how they differ
IWF and SPHQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and SPHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWF | Only in SPHQ |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 15.46% | Mastercard Inc 5.78% |
| APPLE 7.77% | Visa Inc 5.68% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% | Apple Inc 5.60% |
| MICROSOFT 5.55% | Lam Research Corp 4.10% |
| BROADCOM INC 5.10% | Netflix Inc 4.00% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% | GE Vernova Inc 3.92% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% | Costco Wholesale Corp 3.85% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | General Electric Co 3.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 99.9% |
| Holdings | 315 | 100 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 43.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or SPHQ?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against SPHQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-sphq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources