IWF vs QGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWF and QGRW hold 65% of their weight in the same names, and QGRW returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $125.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund.
IWF costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.8 points; IWF is far larger, $128.9bn against $2.7bn.
| IWF | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $128.9bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 65% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.8% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and QGRW hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
65% in common
On the same fields
IWF and QGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.8%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QGRW
QGRW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or QGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +4.0% and QGRW +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or QGRW?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against QGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-qgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWF against QGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-qgrw
[IWF against QGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-qgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.