Which returned more over the last year, IWD or LQD?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and LQD returned −2.7%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWD or LQD?

IWD charges 0.18% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs LQD: how they differ

IWD and LQD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWD	Only in LQD
AMAZON.COM INC 6.04%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%
APPLE 5.83%	ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%
MICROSOFT 4.93%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.54%	CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.54%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.85%	BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.73%	MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.23%	CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IWD and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Russell 1000 value	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+27.4%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+9.9 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.14%
Holdings	814	3149

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or LQD?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and LQD returned −2.7%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or LQD?: IWD charges 0.18% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against LQD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-lqd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources