Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VYM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, LQD or VYM?

LQD charges 0.14% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LQD vs VYM: how they differ

LQD and VYM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in LQD	Only in VYM
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.88%	Broadcom Inc 8.07%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.12%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.11%	Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING L 144A 0.10%	Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC 0.08%	AbbVie Inc 1.57%
MORGAN STANLEY (FXD-FRN) MTN 0.08%	Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
CITIGROUP INC (FX-FRN) 0.07%	Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

LQD and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	US investment grade bonds	US high dividend
Total return, 1 year	−2.7%	+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−20.2 pts	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.04%
Holdings	3149	608

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VYM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −2.7% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VYM?: LQD charges 0.14% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQD against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQD against VYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-vym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources