Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWB and VTWO

Net assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+13.1%
IWB total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; IWB is 2.9 times larger.

IWB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWBVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.1%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$48.6bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.3%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWB VTWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWB
NVIDIA 7.15%
APPLE 7.06%
MICROSOFT 5.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.46%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.63%
BROADCOM INC 2.24%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.92%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +13.1% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.2% (VONE) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 0.5%
Holdings 1025 2002
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $49.1bn $16.6bn

IWB and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.