Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJT vs IWB: how they differ
IJT and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJT and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJT | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.76% | 0.08% |
| CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS | 1.29% | 0.02% |
| USD CASH | 0.02% | 0.09% |
| ADT INC | 0.15% | 0.01% |
| ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES | 0.82% | 0.01% |
| CLEARWAY ENERGY INC CLASS C | 0.45% | 0.01% |
| ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC | 0.46% | 0.01% |
| ETSY | 0.80% | 0.01% |
| EVERUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP | 0.69% | 0.01% |
| FORMFACTOR INC | 1.03% | 0.01% |
| GATES INDUSTRIAL PLC | 0.41% | 0.01% |
| IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS | 0.36% | 0.01% |
| Only in IJT | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| VIASAT INC 1.19% | NVIDIA 7.26% |
| BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 1.09% | APPLE 6.73% |
| PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.03% | MICROSOFT 5.21% |
| RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.98% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.49% |
| ALKERMES 0.91% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.77% |
| STONEX GROUP INC 0.87% | BROADCOM INC 2.40% |
| TG THERAPEUTICS 0.86% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.24% |
| ESCO TECHNOLOGIES 0.82% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 355 | 945 |
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 355 positions, with the top ten at 10.1%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 945 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJT or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJT or IWB?
- IJT charges 0.18% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJT and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against IWB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijt-vs-iwb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources