Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWB vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWB returned +13.1% to IWC's +16.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and IWCNet assets: $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; IWB is far larger, $48.7bn against $1.2bn.
| Measure | IWB | IWC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.1% | +16.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | Russell Microcap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $48.7bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | 5.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or IWC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +13.1% and IWC +16.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or IWC?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iwc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWB against IWC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iwc
[IWB against IWC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iwc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.