IWB vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and IWV hold 96% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

IWB costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IWB is 2.4 times larger.

IWB vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBIWV
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets$49.6bn$20.6bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+16.7%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and IWV hold 96% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

96% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB IWV
NVIDIA 7.44% 7.15%
APPLE 6.77% 6.51%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 3.40%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 2.25%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30% 2.21%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 2.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.56% 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.32%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34% 1.28%
Only in IWB
S&P MID 400 EMINI DEC 26 0.00%
Only in IWV
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.01%
AAR 0.01%
ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH CLASS A 0.01%
ACI WORLDWIDE 0.01%
ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES 0.01%
ALKERMES 0.01%
AMERIS BANCORP 0.01%
APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 87.8%
Holdings 1025 2600
Net assets $49.6bn $20.6bn

IWB and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or IWV?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.