IVW vs QGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
IVW and QGRW hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and QGRW returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $77.4bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund.
IVW costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; IVW is far larger, $75.0bn against $2.7bn.
| IVW | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $75.0bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.2% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVW and QGRW hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
64% in common
On the same fields
IVW and QGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IVW
IVW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About QGRW
QGRW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVW or QGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVW returned +15.7% and QGRW +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IVW or QGRW?
- IVW is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVW against QGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-qgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IVW against QGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-qgrw
[IVW against QGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-qgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.