Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IVV vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IVV returned +13.7% to SMH's +56.8%, and IVV charges 0.03% to SMH's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IVV and SMH

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and $71.1bn for VanEck Semiconductor ETF.

At a glance
+13.7%
IVV total return, 1 year
+56.8%
SMH total return, 1 year
0.03%
IVV expense ratio
0.35%
SMH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.1 points; IVV is 12.4 times larger.

IVV vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVSMH
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+56.8%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high15.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500Semiconductors
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 43.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$885.1bn$71.1bn
Active share vs the S&P 50081%
Holdings
Holdings in common17%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%69%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 773 weekly returns
IVV SMH
Return
Total return edge SMH +687.4% +3,977.0%
Annualized edge SMH +14.9% +28.3%
Price return edge SMH +505.9% +3,365.0%
Risk
Volatility edge IVV 15.6% 26.9%
Max drawdown edge IVV −31.8% −44.2%
Downside capture 99.7% 117.1%
Beta 0.99 1.40
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SMH 0.86 1.00
Sortino edge SMH 1.25 1.53
Treynor 0.081 0.192
Calmar edge SMH 0.47 0.64
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +12.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.33 2.95
Information ratio 0.00 0.96
Tracking error 1.2% 17.4%

Each against its own benchmark: IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; SMH against ACWI, Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SMH returned more: +3,977.0% to +687.4%. IVV swung less: 15.6% to 26.9%. IVV fell less at its worst: −31.8% to −44.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IVV vs SMH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIVVSMHEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+687.4%+3,977.0%SMHPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+28.3%SMHTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+505.9%+3,365.0%SMHPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.6%26.9%IVVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.8%17.5%IVVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.8%−44.2%IVVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.3%197.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.7%117.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.991.40Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.63Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.861.00SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.251.53SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.192Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.64SMHAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+12.6% a yearIVV not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.332.95Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.5%+4.2% to +20.9%IVV includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.000.96Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.2%17.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 773 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

17%

By the books each fund has filed, IVV and SMH hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

17% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IVV SMH
NVIDIA 7.92% 20.15%
BROADCOM INC 2.45% 5.52%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.57% 4.67%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.37% 5.56%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.70% 4.10%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.47% 3.92%
LAM RESEARCH 0.45% 3.54%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.42% 5.48%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 0.32% 4.49%
ANALOG DEVICES 0.31% 4.73%
KLA 0.30% 3.90%
QUALCOMM 0.29% 4.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IVV
APPLE 7.61%
MICROSOFT 5.93%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.83%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.26%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.05%
TESLA INC 1.73%
ELI LILLY 1.54%
Only in SMH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L 9.65%
Asml Holding Nv 4.40%
Sk Hynix Inc 3.78%
Astera Labs Inc 0.99%
Arm Holdings Plc 0.96%
Stmicroelectronics Nv 0.91%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Semiconductors
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +56.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (SPY) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs SPY +43.4 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 79.3%
Holdings 505 25
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $885.1bn $71.1bn

IVV and SMH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6DBCACEAE6

IVV and SMH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IVV follows S&P 500 and SMH follows Semiconductors.
  2. Holdings in common. 17% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IVV returned +13.7% and SMH +56.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 43.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IVV and SMH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

SMH

By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +56.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 43.4 pts. It sits 15.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IVV and SMH in the same category?
IVV is a stock ETF and SMH is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IVV or SMH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVV returned +13.7% and SMH +56.8%.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMH?
IVV is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVV and SMH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVV and 79% of SMH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVV against SMH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivv-vs-smh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.