Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SMH vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SMH returned +56.8% to SPMO's +18.4%, and SPMO charges 0.13% to SMH's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SMH and SPMO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $71.1bn for VanEck Semiconductor ETF and $22.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+56.8%
SMH total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.35%
SMH expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 38.4 points; SMH is 3.2 times larger.

SMH vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSMHSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+56.8%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high15.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksSemiconductorsS&P 500 Momentum Index
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 43.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$71.1bn$22.3bn
Active share vs the S&P 50081%
Holdings
Holdings in common23%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund69%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
SMH SPMO
Return
Total return edge SMH +2,005.5% +519.8%
Annualized edge SMH +31.8% +18.0%
Price return edge SMH +1,778.5% +442.9%
Risk
Volatility edge SPMO 29.4% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −44.2% −28.3%
Downside capture 117.1% 93.8%
Beta 1.40 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SMH 1.01 0.84
Sortino edge SMH 1.55 1.27
Treynor 0.192 0.164
Calmar edge SMH 0.72 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +12.6% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.95 1.28
Information ratio 0.96 0.36
Tracking error 17.4% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: SMH against ACWI, Dec 30, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SMH returned more: +2,005.5% to +519.8%. SPMO swung less: 19.0% to 29.4%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −44.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SMH vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSMHSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2,005.5%+519.8%SMHPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+31.8%+18.0%SMHTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,778.5%+442.9%SMHPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility29.4%19.0%SPMOSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation19.2%12.6%SPMOLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−44.2%−28.3%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture197.3%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture117.1%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.400.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.630.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.010.84SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.551.27SMHReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1920.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.720.63SMHAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWIVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+12.6% a year+3.8% a yearSPMO not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.951.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range+4.2% to +20.9%−2.0% to +9.5%SPMO includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.960.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error17.4%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

23%

By the books each fund has filed, SMH and SPMO hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

23% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SMH SPMO
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.56% 5.48%
Micron Technology Inc 4.67% 8.80%
Intel Corp 4.10% 4.60%
Lam Research Corp 3.54% 2.33%
Applied Materials Inc 3.92% 2.28%
Analog Devices Inc 4.73% 1.04%
Marvell Technology Inc 4.49% 1.02%
Kla Corp 3.90% 1.00%
Teradyne Inc 1.11% 0.39%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc 1.17% 0.30%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SMH
Nvidia Corp 20.15%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L 9.65%
Broadcom Inc 5.52%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.48%
Asml Holding Nv 4.40%
Qualcomm Inc 4.06%
Sk Hynix Inc 3.78%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.17%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.53%
Merck & Co Inc 2.22%
Sandisk Corp 2.20%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Semiconductors Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +56.8% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +43.4 pts vs ACWI +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 79.3% 100.0%
Holdings 25 101
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $71.1bn $22.3bn

SMH and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A81D3854A5

SMH and SPMO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. SMH follows Semiconductors and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 23% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SMH returned +56.8% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 38.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SMH and SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SMH

By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +56.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 43.4 pts. It sits 15.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are SMH and SPMO in the same category?
SMH is a thematic ETF and SPMO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, SMH or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SMH returned +56.8% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, SMH or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SMH and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 79% of SMH and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SMH against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/smh-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.