IUSG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
IUSG and IWF hold 75% of their weight in the same names, and IUSG returned +15.9% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $33.6bn for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF and $125.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
IUSG costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.9 points; IWF is 3.7 times larger.
| IUSG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $33.6bn | $125.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.9% | +4.0% |
| What it tracks | S&P 900 Growth Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 75% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.4% | 57.8% |
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
IUSG and IWF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IUSG follows S&P 900 Growth Index and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 IUSG returned +15.9% and IWF +4.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.9 points.
- Cost. IUSG charges 0.04% of assets a year and IWF 0.18%, a gap of 0.14 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IUSG and IWF hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
75% in common
On the same fields
IUSG and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IUSG
IUSG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 402 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.8%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IUSG or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSG returned +15.9% and IWF +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, IUSG or IWF?
- IUSG is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IUSG against IWF, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iusg-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IUSG against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iusg-vs-iwf
[IUSG against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iusg-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.