Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or IWO?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +13.4% and IWO +7.9%.

Which is cheaper, ITOT or IWO?

ITOT is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do ITOT and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

ITOT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITOT returned +13.4% to IWO's +7.9%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ITOT and IWO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $97.1bn for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

ITOT on its own →IWO on its own →

At a glance

+13.4%

ITOT total return, 1 year

+7.9%

IWO total return, 1 year

0.03%

ITOT expense ratio

0.24%

IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ITOT costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; ITOT is 6.9 times larger.

ITOT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	ITOT	IWO
Return
Measure	ITOT	IWO
Total return, 1 year	+13.4%	+7.9%
Drawdown
Measure	ITOT	IWO
Below its high		9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	ITOT	IWO
What it tracks	S&P Total Market Index (TMI)	Russell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Measure	ITOT	IWO
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$97.1bn	$14.0bn
Holdings
Measure	ITOT	IWO
Holdings in common	2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	33.9%	6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 30, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,186 weekly returns

ITOT IWO

Return

Total return edge ITOT +886.3% +551.9%

Annualized edge ITOT +10.6% +8.6%

Price return edge ITOT +567.2% +456.2%

Risk

Volatility edge ITOT 17.3% 23.2%

Max drawdown edge ITOT (slight) −54.7% −56.5%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge ITOT 0.56 0.39

Sortino edge ITOT 0.80 0.56

Calmar edge ITOT 0.19 0.15

Reading

ITOT returned more: +886.3% to +551.9%. ITOT swung less: 17.3% to 23.2%. ITOT fell slightly less at its worst: −54.7% to −56.5%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: ITOT vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	ITOT	IWO	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+886.3%	+551.9%	ITOT	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+10.6%	+8.6%	ITOT	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+567.2%	+456.2%	ITOT	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	17.3%	23.2%	ITOT	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	12.2%	16.3%	ITOT	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−54.7%	−56.5%	ITOT (slight)	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.56	0.39	ITOT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.80	0.56	ITOT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.19	0.15	ITOT	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,186 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and IWO hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ITOT IWO

10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.01% 0.61%

AAR 0.01% 0.27%

ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH CLASS A 0.01% 0.50%

ACI WORLDWIDE 0.01% 0.38%

ALKERMES 0.01% 0.40%

AMERICAN STATES WATER 0.01% 0.16%

AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS INC CLASS A 0.01% 0.06%

ARCHROCK 0.01% 0.37%

ARCUTIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS 0.01% 0.24%

ARGAN 0.01% 0.31%

ATMUS FILTRATION TECHNOLOGIES 0.01% 0.23%

AXOS FINANCIAL 0.01% 0.04%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ITOT

NVIDIA 7.06%

APPLE 6.78%

MICROSOFT 5.28%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.32%

ALPHABET CLASS A 2.52%

BROADCOM INC 2.18%

ALPHABET CLASS C 2.02%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.83%

Only in IWO

JFROG 0.74%

KINIKSA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIO 0.27%

XENON PHARMACEUTICALS 0.24%

MAREX GROUP LTD 0.22%

CONSTELLIUM SE CLASS A 0.21%

DHT HOLDINGS 0.19%

IMAX 0.16%

AURINIA PHARMACEUTICALS 0.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth

Total return, 1 year +13.4% +7.9%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +8.0% (VTWG)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs VTWG

Expense ratio 0.03% 0.24%

Already in the S&P 500 88.1% 0.0%

Holdings 2443 1122

Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $97.1bn $14.0bn

ITOT and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2A6C3BBE5F

ITOT and IWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

What each follows. ITOT follows S&P Total Market Index (TMI) and IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index.
Holdings in common. 2% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ITOT returned +13.4% and IWO +7.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

ITOT

ITOT tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,443 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or IWO?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +13.4% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or IWO?: ITOT is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

ITOT vs VBK ITOT vs IWF FTGS vs ITOT ITOT vs MOAT IWO vs VIG IWO vs SCHX IWO vs SPYM IWB vs IWO

Where to next

ITOT on its own →IWO on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →ITOT dividend history →ITOT holdings →IWO dividend history →IWO holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ITOT and IWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ITOT and IWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for ITOT ↗

iShares page for IWO ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ITOT against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.