Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to SCHX's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and SCHX

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points.

IWO vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.03%
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$14.0bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 884 weekly returns
IWO SCHX
Return
Total return edge SCHX +513.1% +831.5%
Annualized edge SCHX +11.3% +14.0%
Price return edge SCHX +439.0% +597.2%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHX 22.3% 16.2%
Max drawdown edge SCHX −40.5% −32.3%
Downside capture 100.1% 100.5%
Beta 1.00 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHX 0.52 0.80
Sortino edge SCHX 0.76 1.16
Treynor 0.111 0.129
Calmar edge SCHX 0.28 0.43
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.06 −0.62
Information ratio 0.01 −0.05
Tracking error 1.5% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: IWO against VTWG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHX returned more: +831.5% to +513.1%. SCHX swung less: 16.2% to 22.3%. SCHX fell less at its worst: −32.3% to −40.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWO vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOSCHXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+513.1%+831.5%SCHXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.3%+14.0%SCHXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+439.0%+597.2%SCHXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%16.2%SCHXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.4%11.2%SCHXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.5%−32.3%SCHXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.2%100.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.520.80SCHXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.761.16SCHXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1110.129Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.280.43SCHXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWGIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.06−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +0.7%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.01−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.5%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 884 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and SCHX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO SCHX
JOBY AVIATION CLASS A 0.23% 0.01%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in SCHX
NVIDIA Corp 7.69%
Apple Inc 6.69%
Microsoft Corp 5.42%
Amazon.com Inc 3.66%
Alphabet Inc 2.86%
Broadcom Inc 2.52%
Alphabet Inc 2.28%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 93.6%
Holdings 1122 747
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $14.0bn $74.2bn

IWO and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C582598B6B

IWO and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWO follows Russell 2000 Growth Index and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWO returned +7.9% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.