IMTM vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees

IMTM and SCHF hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned +20.3% over the year. Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF, and $66.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF.

SCHF costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points.

IMTMSCHF
Expense ratio0.30%0.03%
Net assets, IMTM as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHF as of May 31, 2026$4.2bn$66.5bn
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+20.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQFTSE Developed ex US Index
Holdings in common36%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.4%14.8%
Below its high4.3%, high on Aug 17, 20264.6%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+15.3%
IMTM total return, 1 year
+20.3%
SCHF total return, 1 year
0.30%
IMTM expense ratio
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IMTM and SCHF hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

36% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IMTM SCHF
ASML HOLDING 5.21% 2.10%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 2.80% 1.08%
NOVARTIS AG 1.83% 0.97%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 3.16% 0.90%
SHELL 1.91% 0.80%
BHP GROUP LTD 1.51% 0.74%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.68% 0.69%
BANCO SANTANDER 1.51% 0.61%
ALLIANZ 1.10% 0.57%
ABB LTD 1.21% 0.56%
TOTALENERGIES 1.67% 0.53%
IBERDROLA 1.30% 0.50%
Only in IMTM
TORONTO DOMINION 2.25%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.73%
SIEMENS ENERGY N AG 0.88%
NOKIA 0.65%
ENI 0.61%
INVESTOR CLASS B 0.56%
GLAXOSMITHKLINE 0.49%
ENEL 0.46%
Only in SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.32%
SK hynix Inc 2.81%
AstraZeneca PLC 0.93%
Nestle SA 0.88%
Siemens AG 0.77%
Toyota Motor Corp 0.68%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 0.66%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.64%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of International Equity
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +20.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.0 pts +3.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 301 1476
Net assets, IMTM as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHF as of May 31, 2026 $4.2bn $66.5bn

IMTM and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IMTM in plain words

IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 301 positions, with the top ten at 24.4%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SCHF in plain words

SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,476 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IMTM or SCHF?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMTM returned +15.3% and SCHF +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, IMTM or SCHF?
SCHF is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IMTM and SCHF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IMTM and 0% of SCHF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IMTM against SCHF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imtm-vs-schf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.