Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IGM vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGM returned +21.7% to IWF's +0.9%; 61% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGM and IWF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.8 points; IWF is 11.3 times larger.
| Measure | IGM | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $124.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 61% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.8% | 57.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 30, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,334 weekly returnsIGM returned more: +1,968.5% to +1,130.0%. IWF swung less: 18.8% to 23.5%. IWF fell less at its worst: −50.4% to −62.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IGM | IWF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,968.5% | +1,130.0% | IGM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.5% | +10.3% | IGM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +1,744.2% | +842.9% | IGM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.5% | 18.8% | IWF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 16.1% | 13.1% | IWF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −62.6% | −50.4% | IWF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.55 | 0.52 | IGM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.80 | 0.75 | IGM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.20 | 0.20 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,334 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and IWF hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
61% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IGM and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IGM follows S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IGM returned +21.7% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 20.8 points.
- Cost. IGM charges 0.37% of assets a year and IWF 0.18%, a gap of 0.19 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IGM
IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +21.7% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or IWF?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGM against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IGM against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-iwf
[IGM against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.