Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to IWF's +0.9%; 53% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and IWF

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.1 points; IWF is 5.8 times larger.

FTEC vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$22.1bn$127.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common53%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC IWF
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +561.4%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +15.6%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +485.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IWF 21.3% 18.4%
Max drawdown edge IWF (slight) −34.1% −32.5%
Downside capture 100.0% 100.1%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.94 0.77
Sortino edge FTEC 1.41 1.15
Treynor 0.199 0.149
Calmar edge FTEC 0.63 0.48
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −0.58
Information ratio −0.19 −0.11
Tracking error 0.7% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +561.4%. IWF swung less: 18.4% to 21.3%. IWF fell slightly less at its worst: −32.5% to −34.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIWFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+561.4%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+15.6%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+485.1%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%18.4%IWFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%12.4%IWFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−32.5%IWF (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%99.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.77FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.15FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.149Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.48FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTVONGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−0.58Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.19−0.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

53%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IWF hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

53% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC IWF
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 15.30%
Apple Inc 16.21% 8.18%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 5.94%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 4.79%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 3.15%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 2.74%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 1.33%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 0.97%
Lam Research Corp 1.54% 0.91%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.83% 0.81%
Oracle Corp 0.90% 0.67%
Marvell Technology Inc 0.71% 0.64%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Intel Corp 1.65%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.82%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.68%
Salesforce Inc 0.65%
Only in IWF
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
ELI LILLY 3.08%
VISA CLASS A 2.05%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 1.48%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 93.5%
Holdings 281 374
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $124.7bn

FTEC and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4BC453FE15

FTEC and IWF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and IWF +0.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 24.1 points.
  3. Cost. FTEC charges 0.08% of assets a year and IWF 0.18%, a gap of 0.10 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or IWF?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.