Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to VGT's +24.7%; 55% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWF and VGT

Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWF expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.8 points; VGT is 1.2 times larger.

IWF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.9%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Growth IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$127.7bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IWF VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +1,167.4% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge VGT +11.8% +14.9%
Price return edge VGT +890.8% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge IWF 18.3% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge IWF (slight) −50.4% −52.4%
Downside capture 100.1% 99.9%
Beta 1.00 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.60 0.68
Sortino edge VGT 0.87 0.99
Treynor 0.149 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.23 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.58 0.80
Information ratio −0.11 0.19
Tracking error 1.0% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,280.1% to +1,167.4%. IWF swung less: 18.3% to 21.2%. IWF fell slightly less at its worst: −50.4% to −52.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWF vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWFVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,167.4%+2,280.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.8%+14.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+890.8%+1,863.7%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.3%21.2%IWFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.6%14.4%IWFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.4%−52.4%IWF (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.8%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.1%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.600.68VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.99VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1490.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.28VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVONGFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.580.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.3%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.110.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

55%

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VGT hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

55% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWF VGT
NVIDIA 15.30% 17.58%
APPLE 8.18% 15.91%
MICROSOFT 5.94% 11.16%
BROADCOM INC 4.79% 4.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.15% 4.45%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.74% 3.67%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 1.33% 1.55%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.97% 1.24%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.94% 1.53%
LAM RESEARCH 0.91% 1.55%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.85% 0.98%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.81% 1.02%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWF
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
ELI LILLY 3.08%
VISA CLASS A 2.05%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 1.48%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.97%
Only in VGT
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.79%
International Business Machines Corp 0.77%
QUALCOMM Inc 0.76%
Salesforce Inc 0.72%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 0.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 growth Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +0.9% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +1.1% (VONG) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONG −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 93.5% 86.8%
Holdings 374 320
Net assets, IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $124.7bn $154.5bn

IWF and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4E9CDCFDA8

IWF and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 23.8 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 55% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, IWF or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWF and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWF against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.