Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and SCHG

Net assets: $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points.

IEFA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFASCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.04%
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$190.4bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 729 weekly returns
IEFA SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +199.1% +826.5%
Annualized edge SCHG +8.1% +17.2%
Price return edge SCHG +100.2% +723.9%
Risk
Volatility edge IEFA 16.2% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge Tie −34.1% −34.2%
Downside capture 97.7% 108.1%
Beta 1.00 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.45 0.85
Sortino edge SCHG 0.64 1.28
Treynor 0.073 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.24 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.96 0.65
Information ratio 0.25 0.40
Tracking error 3.2% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IEFA against ACWX, Nov 2, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +826.5% to +199.1%. IEFA swung less: 16.2% to 18.5%. IEFA and SCHG fell about the same at their worst: −34.1% and −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IEFA vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFASCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+199.1%+826.5%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.1%+17.2%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+100.2%+723.9%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%18.5%IEFASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.5%12.3%IEFA (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−34.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.1%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture97.7%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.450.85SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.641.28SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0730.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.240.50SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.960.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.9% to +2.5%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.250.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.2%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 729 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEFA SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 94.7%
Holdings 2629 192
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $190.4bn $63.0bn

IEFA and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6B93CF453B

IEFA and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IEFA follows MSCI EAFE IMI Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IEFA returned +12.3% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.