Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.4bn against $5.5bn.

IEFA vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.30%
Net assets$190.4bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
IEFA MAGS
Return
Total return edge MAGS +56.9% +189.1%
Annualized edge MAGS +13.6% +35.2%
Price return edge MAGS +39.2% +181.4%
Risk
Volatility edge IEFA 14.7% 24.0%
Max drawdown edge IEFA −11.9% −26.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 0.63 1.19
Sortino edge MAGS 0.91 1.97
Calmar edge MAGS 1.15 1.33
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +56.9%. IEFA swung less: 14.7% to 24.0%. IEFA fell less at its worst: −11.9% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IEFA vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAMAGSEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+56.9%+189.1%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+35.2%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+39.2%+181.4%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.7%24.0%IEFASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.2%14.5%IEFALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−11.9%−26.6%IEFADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.631.19MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.911.97MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.151.33MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEFA MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 2629 8
Net assets $190.4bn $5.5bn

IEFA and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

IEFA and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or MAGS?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.