Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IEFA vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IEFA and PDBC

Net assets: $190.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.3 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.1bn against $8.0bn.

IEFA vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIEFAPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IMI IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$190.1bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IEFA PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI EAFE Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark −2.0 pts vs ACWX +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.59%
Holdings 2629 1
Net assets, IEFA as of Oct 28, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $190.4bn $8.0bn

IEFA and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IEFA and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or PDBC?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IEFA against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.