Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and IEFA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $5.0bn for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF and $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.6 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.4bn against $5.0bn.

HGER vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.07%
Net assets$5.0bn$190.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER IEFA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 0 2629
Net assets $5.0bn $190.4bn

HGER and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.61 percentage points a year. That is about $61 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.