Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VXUS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VXUS's +13.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VXUS

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $163.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+13.8%
VXUS total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.05%
VXUS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VXUS costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.8 points.

PDBC vs VXUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVXUS
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+13.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.1%, high on Sep 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap ex US Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.05%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VXUS as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$163.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VXUS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VXUS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VXUS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 4.27%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.03%
SK hynix Inc 1.67%
SLCMT1142 1.66%
ASML Holding NV 1.55%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.76%
HSBC Holdings PLC 0.76%
Roche Holding AG 0.66%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +13.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.05%
Holdings 1 8913
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VXUS as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $163.2bn

PDBC and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VXUS

VXUS tracks an index of Total International Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8,913 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VXUS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VXUS +13.8%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VXUS?
VXUS is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VXUS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vxus

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.